Copenhagen must deliver emission cuts at or beyond current proposals

Copenhagen, 9 December 2009 Independent analyses of current mitigation proposals on the table in Copenhagen by Nicholas Stern, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Ecofys, Climate Analytics, the Sustainability Institute (C-ROADS), the European Climate Foundation and ClimateWorks (Project Catalyst) all point to the same conclusion: the negotiations must deliver the high-end of current proposals, and stretch beyond them, if the world is to have a reasonable chance of containing warming to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, or the 1.5°C goal of many developing nations.

There is a narrow window of opportunity to have the possibility of achieving the global political and scientific consensus of avoiding a global warming of more than 2°C above pre-industrial levels or the 1.5°C goal of 100 developing nations. The concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is increasing everyday and, without significant reductions in emissions, will soon reach levels at which the consequent changes in the Earth’s climate will have very serious, and potentially disastrous and irreversible, impacts.

Full press release here.

This statement is supported by and may be attributed to:

– Nicholas Stern, Chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment

– Achim Steiner, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)

– Bill Hare, Director, Climate Analytics

– Niklas Hahne, Director Energy and Climate Policy, Ecofys

– Bas de Leeuw, Executive Director, Sustainability Institute, C-ROADS

– Andreas Merkl, Director of Global Initiatives at ClimateWorks and Project Catalyst leader

– Jules Kortenhorst, CEO of the European Climate Foundation

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Copenhagen must deliver emission cuts at or beyond current proposals”

  1. Are you aware of any analysis that outlines the economic cost to people like ourselves
    of meeting the IPCC’s CO2 emission reduction demands and transfers to less developed countries?

    If not, do you think such an analysis is warranted and would be useful?

    Cheers

    Roger

    http://www.rogerfromnewzealand.wordpress.com

    1. Hi Roger, I no longer work in this specific field. But I do know that at the time McKinsey had some good analyses on this matter. The link in the full press release has contact details of, among others, Jules Kortenhorst, who surely can point you to the right source.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.